Didn’t Trump explicitly say the US is putting Maduro’s second in command in charge? If so, that makes any benefits to the people from removing Maduro pretty unlikely. Besides removing sanctions, assuming the new dictator kisses the ring.
It is actually done by the government too. Case in point the Tennessee man who was arrested and jailed for a month. Why? for social media posts critical of Charlie Kirk
That's why the ACLU used to have principles and support extremist groups' right to speech. If they come for them, they'll come for you next. How can you mediate the boundaries of conversation? Every individual must be allowed to peacefully express their opinion. Anyone being attacked for doing so will get support of any classical liberal still around. Call them names if you want, it doesn't work anymore.
It's even worse, IMO. That guy was replying on a thread about Charlie Kirk, but he was critical of Trump, and expressed that criticism with a direct quote from Trump.
No. The simplest example is a matter-dominated universe at exactly the critical density. It decelerates forever but never quite stops expanding--the expansion rate asymptotes to zero.
No, in much the same way that a speeding vehicle slowly decelerating towards a stop doesn't mean that it will return to where it started the journey.
Actually it's worse than that, "decelerating forever" doesn't even mean that it ever even comes entirely to a stop. let alone return to where it started.
Would it not enter the viscinity of other objects which would eventually coalesce into local centers of mass (maybe like one per observable universe diameter or something)?
You have to ignore just about every other part of the story to arrive at this breathless conclusion.
Let’s remember that for this project alone Hyundai invested more money than 99% of us will ever see into this country, and more sum labor hours than any of our individual lives. That’s not what disrespect looks like.
Maybe their visas were not in order so ok enforce that. But not by having their engineers perp walked on live television.
As a side note, if we are going to judge the Hyundai engineers then we must also believe that Elon Musk should have been deported due to his well known early career visa violations. or be damned as hypocrites.
So even tho they broke the law, their treatment was unfair because ... money? Got it. And the embarrassment of being recognized for the crime they committed? Those poor souls - true injustice!
Their treatment was unfair because ICE is a domestic terrorism organization and they got fucking propaganda paraded on live television.
Look around you. Is this really the US you want to be living in? Are you really so pathetic as to be proud of this?
What kind of people do we want to be? Do we really want to be cruel cunts and wave around a "well it's technically legal!!1!" flag? Is that who YOU want to be? Is that how the US should treat allies which invest billions into our economy?
I see. So, when SK perp walks its own illegal migrant arrests on TV, it's "totally fine" (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rEqFXzeTm5w). But if the US does it to criminal South Koreans? "Propaganda! Propaganda! Propaganda!" Hmm, a racist double standard you'd like to preserve?
So...arresting crims in the US (but not SK) and locking up psychos who dismember young Americans is (for you) 'domestic terrorism', because you're ... fine with rampant crime and bloodshed against Americans? But "terrified" of Americans feeling safe, and society being peaceful? Huh, okay. Are you South Korean and lacking empathy?
Or are you in fact MS-13 or TDA? Or ... I know this dates me a bit, Al-Qaieda or Daesh? If not, maybe apply today. You're already making them proud. Good on you, you've found your purpose!
a cursory Google search reveals that they deny anthropogenic climate change, reject the idea of women in the workplace, and wish to deny marriage rights to homosexuals
They are conservative and have a few idiots and extremist people in their ranks yes, but that doesn't make the party as a whole extremist.
I never heard about their women-workspace-denial.
And being against marriage of homosexuals was the majority opinion from the beginning of time until around 10 years ago so you can hardly count that as extremist.
With data starvation driving ai companies towards synthetic data I’m surprised that an easily synthesized problem like this hasn’t been trained out of relevance. Yet here we are with proof that it hasn’t
Are we a hundred percent sure it isn't a watermark that is by design?
A quick test anyone can run and say, yup, that is a model XYZ derivative running under the hood.
Because, as you quite rightly point out, it is trivial to train the model not to have this behaviour. For me, that is when Occam kicks in.
I remember initially believing the explanation for the Strawberry problem, but one day I sat down and thought about it, and realized it made absolutely zero sense.
The explanation that Karpathy was popularizing was that it has to do with tokenization.
However, models are not conscious of tokens, and they certainly don't have any ability to count them without tool help.
Additionally, if it were a tokenization issue, we would expect to spot the issue everywhere.
So yeah, I'm thinking it's a model tag or insignia of some kind, similar to the fun logos you find when examining many silicon integrated circuits under a microscope.
Business plan, revenue, people: these are all valid signals to form an investment hypothesis. People often outweighs all others wrt early stage companies.
You would have been a fool to invest in apple in the late 90s on any other signal than the return of Steve Jobs. That era created many rich fools.
reply