Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | more angry_moose's commentslogin

Duolingo is little better than a gacha game these days. It wasn't bad early on but its nearly unusable these days.

I like Babbel a lot for early levels - its gotten me back to a rough-B2 German level. I was probably approaching C1 in college, slipped to an A2 from lack of use, but I'm building it back up; and spent a while learning Norwegian from scratch a couple years ago on it.

Pimsleur is probably next on my list once I top out on Babbel to build up speaking.

Interesting idea on the ChatGPT sentence prompts. I'm not sure I fully trust it for that, but its worth a try.

Edit: Hm. Interesting idea. It's definitely a bit better at German than me, but its still making a handful of mistakes (as compared against other sources).


Almost certainly going to get killed by DOGE though:

https://www.businessinsider.com/irs-direct-file-doge-treasur...


DOGE and this admin won't be around forever. Looking forward to the reboot.


I wish I shared your optimism. I think the process will be more like rebuilding from a pile of rubble than restarting a working system.


Tomato tomato. No optimism, only positive nihilism. We're all default dead, humans have existed for ~300k years, this is another bump in the road.


>won't be around forever

they're working on it.


Worth noting the 10 year are spiking again today and are currently at a higher level than Wednesday: https://www.marketwatch.com/investing/bond/tmubmusd10y?count...

(though they have started recovering some since I posted this originally)



Ahhh, thanks!


"Ladel" isn't actually in the dictionary:

https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/ladel

https://www.dictionary.com/browse/ladel

https://www.collinsdictionary.com/us/spellcheck/english?q=la...

OED has it as an incorrect/unusual variant:

https://www.oed.com/search/dictionary/?scope=Entries&q=ladel

It's misspelled constantly on the internet, but "ladle" is the correct spelling.


Ah, fair enough! Thanks


A few pieces of feedback from me:

1) Keyboard input would be really nice, especially playing on desktop

2) A "give up" button instead of a 5 minute timeout would be appreciated

3) It might be more fun/challenging if you don't give the category, but have to guess the category after unscrambling the words.


Keyboard is essential; my time was dominated not by the time it took me to solve but the time it took me to click around with my mouse.


As they're the name of US professional sports teams, that's the official name of the teams.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Atlanta_Hawks https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Detroit_Lions https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/San_Antonio_Spurs

Previous puzzles don't have many plurals, but its the correct choice for this puzzle.


It cuts both ways.

Cryptic Crosswords are almost impenetrable from the US as they're so deep in UK specific words, spellings, and trivia.


I love cryptic crossword, but there's so many "inside rules" that make them hard to approach for newcomers. It doesn't help that there really aren't a lot of good easy cryptics.


Yeah but that's like saying that there are so many "openings" in chess, it makes it hard for newcomers.

That's the game! The 'inside rules' for a cryptic are what makes it cryptic. Without them you just have a word puzzle.


The thing with chess, even if you don't know the rules, you can still play and (potentially) lose the game. If you don't know some random american trivia, you're stuck forever.


there are some good american and canadian cryptics but i agree, it's a largely uk-centred pastime.


Interesting. Any suggestions?

I've looked in the past and didn't have much luck.


lots of suggestions here: https://old.reddit.com/r/crosswords/comments/kqkbrq/what_are...

the new yorker archives are a great place to start https://www.newyorker.com/tag/cryptic-crossword



The place I most notice it is the Hugo nominations.

Pre-2010 its almost exclusively a White Male author club.

2010-2016 seemed to be a fairly decent balance.

2017 and later there's basically been no White Males. Scalzi seems to be "grandfathered in" somehow with a few of nominations, then Andy Weir and Kim Stanley Robinson with 1 each. Certainly no millennial or younger either, as the article discusses.

The old status quo was bad, but even I have to admit its over-corrected a bit.


The way I see it, I read sci-fi for different ways of looking at the world. I realized that I had stopped reading straight-white-male authors, not by design, but just because it always felt like I had read it before. Even the really "innovative" ones were innovating within a really narrow set of parameters.

I have no idea what criteria the Hugo nominators use. And it's certainly not up to me to yuck anybody else's yum. But I can say that I'm finding a lot to think about in books by authors who would likely be dismissed as "woke" based solely on their appearance.


It is if its manufacturing technology. Knowing what something is/how it works is a lot different than knowing how to make it.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: