Wikipedia has a number of notorious and strange editors who have taken it over as if it was their personal kingdom, where they censor and revert at their pleasure. It's their Wikipedia versus for the public. MrOllie is among the most infamous (somehow has over 258,000 edits - WTH) of this type of editor (or sadistic censor), with a number of articles and posts elsewhere on the Internet about him[1][2].
Complaints about him seem to do nothing, as he appears to have support and students of his brand of sadism and censorship. For instance, Remsense (over 97,000 edits). The group that they are part of, backs each other up and gangs up on others, to make sure they'll get their way.
Don't know what Disney was thinking with letting her continually wreck Star Wars for so long and lose them money. The franchise is near destroyed. Has only a small chance of recovery.
But, star buying for GitHub is a thing too. This is why you have to look at things like number of contributors, forks, watchers, and pull requests. Just a lot of stars, without the other positive indicators, can be an indication that the project is not so engaging as it might seem or its supposed popularity is fake.
Nim (Python-like) and Crystal (Ruby-like) are not C-like languages. Arguably, those languages are targeting a different audience. There are other C family and C style syntax languages that compile directly to C or has it as one of its backends.
Maybe make or focus on parks where people can exercise, re-emphasize school playgrounds, and gym time. Otherwise, you are going to have to stock up on Ozempic, just to be able to serve, despite those being recruited are young and should naturally be in their physical primes.
Vlang compiles to human readable C too, like Nim, not Odin and Jai. Here's a post to read on V's rational for doing so[1]. Incredibly, some vocal competitors mocked V's developers for its decision, then years later, have been quietly trying to copy or "steal" other ideals without giving credit (that they previously made fun of).
V's approach is to have various backends, in addition to native (to be focused on from 0.6); C, JavaScript, WASM, etc...
Exactly. When a certain moderation style is allowed, it attracts aligned personality types and produces a distinct culture. When toxicity becomes the norm, it is enjoyed by sadists and the demented, who have positioned themselves appropriately to get off on it.
The thing is, what you are describing is arguably theft. It is purposefully circumventing the license and restrictions chosen by the author, in order to steal their code, so that it can be sold and used for profit. This is along the same lines of why book authors and artists have been suing AI companies.
Another point, there is a lot of free and permissive license content to train AI on, where the GPL or copyright can be respected. In many cases, the violating AI companies knew what they were doing was wrong.
You should be allowed to prefer or have interest in different languages and not have envious competitors try to blank you out. Which is a strange thing being promoted around here.
Vlang is indeed worthy of a look, as great project, with (at present count) 807 contributors and more than 37,000 stars.
reply