Thanks! For gaming: the Bevy demo shows how to calculate real lighting using exact technical parameters from actual products.
for sure it is technical, but the point is it doesn't have to be a big Windows-only app – an installer can estimate what to put where using real data, just in the browser. These files tell much more than a product picture.
Lighting engineers and manufacturers can use it too, though they'd likely want consulting or custom integration, or at least would need some kind of customizable reporting (For Mac there's also a QuickLook extension to browse files visually.)
Thanks!
For gaming: the Bevy demo shows how to calculate real lighting using
exact technical parameters from actual products.
for sure it is technical, but the point is it doesn't have to be a big Windows-only
app – an installer can estimate what to put where using real data,
just in the browser. These files tell much more than a product picture.
Lighting engineers and manufacturers can use it too, though they'd
likely want consulting or custom integration, or at least would need some kind of customizable reporting
(For Mac there's also a QuickLook extension to browse files visually.)
Oh well, it is open source, you are welcome to have a look..
the web part is done in Leptos, the 3D part in Bevy.
Most of it (as much as possible, to share across) is simple Rust.
pyo3 makes it the python-module
uniffi makes the bindings, to Swift/Kotlin
the adaption of it even for CangJue (the Huawei HarmonyOs)
So basically well known and very good Open Source
For wasm to mention, i use wasm-split (the bevy part is quite big and loaded optionally, something like pdf exporter as well should go like this)
Brotli compression is very much recommended, specifically for bevy and font stuff, where it shines compared to zip (sth like 55% savings on zip, but 70% with brotli)
Specific to US copyright law, there are exceptions for "public persons". Without these exceptions, it would severely restrict reporting on said persons. The most important part of that last sentence is elected officials. In any highly advanced democracy, you want to grant your media wide access to elected officials for reporting purposes.
>the simple sounding proposal has a lot of complexity hiding behind it.
Okay? We're not on a legal forum drafting the 50 page law to cover all those loopholes. I'm nor even sure if the posting limit here would faciliate that.
I trust some decent lawyers can take the high level suggestions and dig into the minutae when it comes to real policy. And I find it a bit annoying to berate the community because they aren't acting as a lawyer (and no one here claims to be one AFAIK).
>If I’m a photographer, do I have to get consent from both the divorced parents to photograph the kids? The kids themselves?
Check your state laws. The answer will vary immensely. Another reason a global forum like this isn't the best place to talk about law.
AFAIK that is not correct. They are issued by the government. Required by the government to be displayed on the car if you are driving on public roads. But the plate is not physically owned by the government. The biggest distinction seems to be that in some states it becomes part of the car, and in other states it stays with the driver when ownership of the car changes hands (or the owner of the car can choose either option when selling the car).
As an aside, these days I am guessing the latter is the truth in most states. So many specialty and personalized plate options out there that people are going to want to keep for themselves.
Obviously the government does own a small number of plates, of course, because they attach them to government owned vehicles.
Exactly, this would greatly reduce the ability for scammers in "urgent" situations, but for power users who flip the switch on day one it would rarely be a problem. What would be terrible though ... is if Google made it require a network connection or Google approval.
Under that logic, even if the app is "malicious" it would still be possible to install it. And thats not true, if somthing is deemed malicious, its blocked. Is app that hurts Google's dominance "malicious"? Who is it that decides what is malicious?
