Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | jeremiahlee's commentslogin

Israeli government officials wearing golden noose lapel pins is…quite the fashion statement.


"are we the baddies?"


[flagged]


"More than 50,000 children reportedly killed or injured in the Gaza Strip" - https://www.unicef.org/press-releases/unimaginable-horrors-m...


Wait, isn't that statistic from the same source that claims that in the entire war, not a single hamas member was even targeted at all? That these numbers come from hamas?

(well, I should clarify, because I am going to bet a lot that you don't even understand how hamas' claims really work. Hamas is not claiming Israel isn't targeting and killing hamas members. Their claim comes directly from the religion, namely that there isn't any difference between civilians and soldiers, between 3 year old girls and "what you call" terrorists (and they call mujahid), between Gazan grandmothers and leaders of hamas. That all of the above are killing Jews or dying trying, and it is just a stupid mistake of Israel not to target everyone. And no I'm not putting it badly here, if you read the hadith you will find much worse images, involving pregnant women and wombs, involving crowds beating ... Hamas says this because they see it (I'd even say "sell it", both to you and to their muslim patrons) as simply what their religion demands. Hamas is not putting out those numbers because they think this death toll on their side is terrible. They're putting out these numbers because they're proud of them, to prove they deserve more money, more support, more ... from muslims, they're putting out these numbers because they see these deaths as "the ultimate expression of muslim faith". In other words they're not claiming Israel isn't hitting hamas members, they're claiming that even if a baby was still in the womb and got hit, even that baby was convinced by hamas to fight for allah and thus was a hamas member. Of course the people actually dying don't really agree, but hamas has guns)

In other words, hamas isn't exaggerating these numbers to get a reaction from you. They're exaggerating them because it proves to their financiers how well the recruitment drive "to defend islam" is going. It should be understood as propaganda for arabic consumption. Should be understood as "look how well we're doing! Even 50.000 children are dying for our holy intifada! Send more money!".


I have to say, your Unit 8200 colleagues seem to have leaked data showing 83% civilian deaths. Maybe check with them before your next shift?

"Israeli army database suggests at least 83% of Gaza dead were civilians" - https://www.972mag.com/israeli-intelligence-database-83-perc...


As a counterargument, may I present the frontpage of 972mag?

https://www.972mag.com

I'm not even sure what is currently on it, but I'm sure it will get the point across that they're not neutral and not afraid of changing the truth as required.


"Video shows Israeli forces shooting Palestinians dead moments after surrender" - https://www.theguardian.com/world/2025/nov/28/video-shows-is...

The compatibility clause seems to be confusing several commenters. There is official documentation explaining the license compatibility.

Visually: https://interoperable-europe.ec.europa.eu/collection/eupl/li...

Matrix of licenses: https://interoperable-europe.ec.europa.eu/collection/eupl/ma...


Related: Zdenek Nemec's talk "APIs for AI: Have we failed?" from Nordic APIs 2024 is an insightful articulation of AI agents as a distinct persona to accommodate in platform and security decisions.

https://nordicapis.com/sessions/apis-for-ai-have-we-failed/


Nice, someone just shared it with me yesterday!


GNAP could be considered the successor to OAuth 2.0

https://oauth.xyz/


JavaScript is a registered trademark. It would be easier for everyone if Oracle released the trademark registration than for the letter signers to file a legal petition requesting the USPTO cancel the registration.


The site explicitly says they tried to get Oracle to release the trademark before, and that this is their final attempt at doing so before filing wigh the USPTO.


Hi, I'm the author. I read over 20 studies before writing this post and stand by my conclusion: there is not conclusive evidence blue spectrum light specifically is worse than other illumination.

I only linked to the most interesting outliers that could not reproduce the most cited study's findings. I also linked to the most rigorous study (3 groups: using Night Shift, not using Night Shift, not using phone at all in a natural setting instead of lab) with the largest sample size (167 people) and duration (7 consecutive nights) that found no observable benefit from using Night Shift, only not using a phone before bed.

Here's another rigorous study in a lab setting with similar conclusions: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6561503/


seriously? the iphone study suggest that users stop "consuming" blue light 1 hour before sleep. they don't even control for other substances like coffee or alcohol intake or medication other than "sleep disorders"... your _robust_ ipad study has 12 people...

one of the links i posted is a meta-analysis on the subject that skimmed down ~ 130 studies down to 15 because bad metodology & conclude that blue light has effect on sleep quality


Hi, I'm the author. The use of AI OSINT is another consequence I will consider for a followup. Thanks for sharing.


Just tested with Zen v1.0.0-a.26. User agent reports: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.15; rv:129.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/129.0

Exact match with Firefox v129.0.1: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.15; rv:129.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/129.0


He's not asking about the User-Agent string sent to websites.

He's asking about how the browser identifies itself to the Windows operating system. According to him, other forks say simply "Firefox," which makes it impossible to run them alongside the official Firefox release.


Website getting hugged to death for a second day. Direct link to downloads from the GitHub releases: https://github.com/zen-browser/desktop/releases


Sweden's parliament just voted to support chat control in the Council of Ministers at EU level.

https://alpaca.gold/@Jeremiah/112637416326793501


As per the comments there, this still has to go through Parlament and the ECJ is the 'last stop' on this


My understanding is the ECJ can overturn legislation that has been passed and appealed, but it can't pre-emptively block legislation?


That's a good question, I'd say you are right but I'm not sure of all the details

(but then again, between passing and actual implementation there's a much to unfold)


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: