Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | jerlam's commentslogin

Coffeezilla was probably lucky in that the initial crypto scams he investigated were so public and blatant, there was so much obvious evidence and the scammers were often foolish enough to talk to him on the record.

I don't think the old pyramid was around for decades. According to wikipedia, the "carbs on the bottom" food pyramid was only recommended from 1992 - 2005, or 13 years. Those dates just happen to coincide with the age group of 30-50 year old adults that are over-represented here.

It was replaced with a rainbow-like pyramid in 2005 which completely negated the concept of a pyramid, and then a circle (plate) in 2011.

We need to stop bringing up the food pyramid that everyone already agreed was bad and replaced 20 years ago.


Also possible they have your location if you went to the hospital. Maybe from any Meta "partners" or third party brokers.

Previously:

California PG&E joins proposal to set utility rates based on income (2023)

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=37124238

California's electricity rates will shift to a fixed fee based on income (2024)

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40312518


I've seen something like this before...

Twelve years ago: Want: The airbag scarf that replaces a bulky bicycle helmet, inflates in 100ms

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=6685798

The Tragic End of The Hövding Airbag Helmet (2025)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HS9Q6D992M4


The classic rule of "might makes right".

Manufacturers sometimes change things that already work, just to separate the "old technology" and the new. When people want a completely new car, they expect things to be different and new, even if they are worse.

I believe Toyota did this frequently in their Prius models, where things were different from mainline Toyota just because, like the center-mounted speedometer and the joystick shifter.


Pebble also has a bad track record of making lasting products.

The original Pebbles had a zebra strip connector to the display which had problems; and their last product, the Pebble 2, had buttons made of a soft silicon rubber which quickly fell apart. The fact that the new Pebble company sold a brand new product (the Pebble 2 Duo) with the same defective design is worrying.


Probably related:

Hyundai Motor Group plans to deploy humanoid robots at US factory from 2028

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46508588


Except, of course, the most popular smartwatch (Apple Watch) which extends the glass above the case, giving it zero protection against impacts from the front.

FWIW the same is true of the Rolex Daytona and Patek Philippe Nautilus.

There’s probably an actual reason for why this is done. On a mechanical watch I’d often prefer for the crystal to be damaged rather than the case, though I’m not sure that the same logic works for Apple Watches.


Does one ever polish a crystal? Having it raised would make that much easier (also if one does, tell me who can do it to mine, my crystal is scratched to the point where I can't read my watch if the main lighting is behind me).

It might be possible, but I’m quite sure nobody does it with newer crystals. The replacement costs just aren’t high enough to justify the effort

Also, they just don’t really scratch.


> Also, they just don’t really scratch.

Do I need to take a photo of my crystal? Maybe mineral crystals don't scratch but glass ones certainly do.


Sure, but I was referring to new high-end watches which mostly use sapphire crystals.

If you have a glass crystal, you can easily polish that at home. There’s a polywatch polishing paste you should look at.


Having a soft but easily polishable crystal made of acrylic was a feature of old military watches. The softer crystal was more easily scratched, but fixable; and less prone to shattering, which would completely break the watch.

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: