Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | malcolmgreaves's commentslogin

Hey dummy, the point of having an immigration hearing is to establish whether or not the deportation is legal.

“I’m quoting the numbers from the fascists themselves. See they’re doing nothing wrong!”

Okay, how many people do you think they've deported?

US declares war on Venezuela without Congress. The republicans have really destroyed the constitution.

It’s not an intimidating voice. Gen Z are just cry babies.

The point at which you _could_ start to have undefined behavior is within an `unsafe` block or function. So even if the "failure" occurred in some "safe" part of the code, the conditions to make that failure would start in the unsafe code.

When debugging, we care about where the assumptions we had were violated. Not where we observe a bad effect of these violated assumptions.

I think you get here yourself when you say:

> triggering undefined behavior can in theory cause the program to do anything, including fail spectacularly within seemingly unrelated safe code

The bug isn't where it failed spectacularly. It's where the C++ code triggered undefined behavior.

Put another way: if the undefined behavior _didn't_ cause a crash / corrupted data, the bug _still_ exists. We just haven't observed any bad effects from it.


What does “n8n” stand for? I’m assuming it’s a shortening of a longer word, like k8s.


I've been pronouncing it as "nanites" in my head since the first time I've seen it. Dunno why and now I feel just a tiny silly, though I still prefer my pronunciation.

Needless to say I never had to actually say "n8n".


i believe it stands for “nodemation”


Correct, check the "Our name" section at: https://n8n.io/press/


naaathaaan


Is that intoned like Ricardo Montalbán's "Khaaaan!" ?


I think more "Fenton!"...

https://youtu.be/3GRSbr0EYYU


Are a few hand-picked winners from VCs hand-picking the next generation's winners _actually_ creating any sort of social prosperity?


When did SV ever actually do what you're claiming? Need to see some evidence of this claim before taking it as true.

From my observations, SV just had good marketing and PR during the 2000s - 2010s.


> he was saying that people who believe in free speech are trash, targeting X users with hate.

That’s not hate speech.

You sound like Michael from the office!


The GP didn't say it was hate speech. Said it was hate. And calling someone trash... yeah, I think that fits within my definition of hate.


Incorrect. They're not a C corp, they're a public benefit corporation. They have a different legal obligation. Notably, they have a legal obligation to deliver on their mission. That's why Anthropic is the only actual mission-driven AI company. They do have to balance that legal obligation with the traditional legal obligations that a for-profit corporation has. But most importantly, it is actually against the law for them not to balance prioritizing making money and prioritizing AI safety!


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: