Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | nidificate's commentslogin

But you can buy NFC tags for relatively cheap.


You go to market with the printer you have, not the gizmos you'd like you have. You'd wind up printing something anyway to let people know about the NFC tag. And if you are printing something out, you may as well just add a QR code for folks who like that method.

There's a "if you give a yak a razor" joke in there somewhere.


I could, but printing a QR tag is even faster and cheaper, and there are no real benefits to the NFC in this case.


Do iOS or Android have any requirements vis a vis HSTS or HPKP?


banking apps require them anyway (because of pci-dss etc)


Is it easier to corrupt one institution or five?


Looking at how fast the Republican Senate became supplicant to Trump, the separation did not turn out so "separate" after all due to the concentration of parties.


How many people would be willing to pay $10/month for something that they currently get for free?


Often times in politics, what is a "lie" is more a matter of opinion rather than fact. Who gets to be the arbiter of truth?


If only we had some sort of system, where individuals could be sued for making damaging statements. Maybe each side could present their case, and a jury of their peers could be the ultimate deciders.


That system certainly doesn't sound like facebook to me.


In theory, the electorate. They vote out politicians who lie. In practice, people don’t seem to care.


Facebook makes more than $5 per user but the average is brought down by lower revenue in Asia/Pacific. For users in US/Canada the revenue per user is over $20.

https://www.cnbc.com/2017/11/02/facebooks-revenue-topped-5-p...


> Spartan planning is both direct and unrealistic: find a choke-point, fortify it and hold it indefinately with a hoplite army. Attempted at Thermopylae this plan fails; the Battle of Thermopylae is often represented in popular culture as an intentional delaying action, but it was nothing of the sort – Herodotus is clear that this was supposed to be the decisive land engagement (Hdt. 7.175; Cf. Diodorus 11.4.1-5).


He is wrong about that. Herodotus says that they were an advance front to buy time for the rest, who were at a religious festival and at the Olympics:

“The force with Leonidas was sent forward by the Spartans in advance of their main body, that the sight of them might encourage the allies to fight, and hinder them from going over to the Medes, as it was likely they might have done had they seen that Sparta was backward. They intended presently, when they had celebrated the Carneian festival, which was what now kept them at home, to leave a garrison in Sparta, and hasten in full force to join the army. The rest of the allies also intended to act similarly; for it happened that the Olympic festival fell exactly at this same period. None of them looked to see the contest at Thermopylae decided so speedily; wherefore they were content to send forward a mere advanced guard.”


Xenophan and Plutarch probably hit a bit to do with it.


Absolutely. Anybody who's read Plutarch's Parallel Lives would be hard pressed to not have some degree of fascination with Sparta.



It was opt-out, not mandatory.


Was it? My bad. I thought I read something about GitLab planning to block access to the platform until you accepted the new ToS but maybe I was wrong.

My point still stands though.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: