Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | sfe22's commentslogin

It doesn’t take 90 million iranians to push a button.


Here in the US, our soldiers insert their nuclear keys and await instructions to turn them several times per day. If even just ONE of the hundreds of pairs of soldiers turns the key, then ALL the nukes get launched. 99.999999% of Americans have no say either.

The truth is that Iran doesn't want to take out the holy sites in Israel and if martyrdom were the real goal, then Iran would have started all-out war with Israel decades ago.


I first thought the first part is a joke. Didn’t know that. You make a good point below too.


What exactly makes Gaza that important


It's location in relation to Israel, the Mediterranean, Egypt, Suez canal, etc.


That doesn't really answer it?

I have yet to see how this little strip of land is so valuable to our interests


You need to look offshore.


I don't follow


Took the “Do Things that Don't Scale” to the absolute limit


Does this mean Apple is a major ad-tech player involved in buying and selling their own customer data (through partner comany but that does not matter much does it)?


It’s trivial to change default search provider, not sure why Apple wouldn’t take the money. It’s still up to the user.


Defaults are powerful, most people don't notice or care


Defaults are quite literally worth about $18-$20bn simply in the iOS market.


Yeah. This is an understatement, and its not a weak statement.


Have you tried 5w slow charging?


Yes, that works. Also putting my phone in the fridge works too.


Yeah, you nailed with the word choice here.

Dictator needs to be a ruler, that also you cannot get rid of. In most of the us you can ditch your boss tonight.

It looks like you want a real dictator to “protect” you from possible poor decisions you can make. Which is fine, just don’t get me and others like me involved please.


As an American working in Germany after working in San Francisco for a company with unlimited time off (Uber), I prefer Germany without even thinking about it.

The US labor system is so insanely broken I don't even know where to begin.


It is fine to have opinions. I may even agree with your opinion. Pushing it to others is what i am against.


What do you mean? That's the entire point of talking about things.


I may agree that 25 days off at a certain job is better for that individual, or even me. What i am against is creating creating government rules that impose such schemes into everyone without their consent.


Without the government imposing such schemes you end up where the USA is right now: a few skilled jobs are granted the extreme privilege of time off, for the rest you grant nothing. Are they peasants in your eyes?

The government should be responsible to provide a minimum of quality of life to its citizens, to give away this power is to relinquish one of the main benefits of being a State.

End of child labour and slavery was imposed onto a lot of societies without everyone's consent, it doesn't mean it is wrong for the government to do so.

Imposing a minimum of paid time off to humans, allowing humans to have time off from work to actually enjoy being humans, is to determine a minimum baseline of quality of life to all of your citizens. You seem to rather prefer to only allow that to a privileged class, because that's what happens in reality when the government does not impose a modicum of morality into the system.


> a few skilled jobs are granted the extreme privilege of time off, for the rest you grant nothing. Are they peasants in your eyes?

No not at all. I believe lower skilled workers are on this position due to the policies we have had for some time now, which most of them actually support. I respect all workers that contribute honestly.


LOL what bollocks. Do you even know what governments are for?

Hint: Not to protect the handful of super rich billionaire type owners. I know, I know, unique concept as an American...


You think in your country the government serves you. That is a very naive way of thinking. Why would they love you so much, is it because you bother to show up at a polling station once in a couple of years, or is there some other source of attraction?


No other source. Getting elected is kind of important for a democratically elected leadership though.

Not every country has 'SuperPACs' and other corrupt ways of getting elected by throwing enough corporate millions and billions one way though.


Keep dreaming buddy. You may love your ruler, but that is a one way relationship. Your ruler doesn’t even think about you.


Here you are pushing your opinion on opinions on us.


No, i am not the one advocating for mandatory schemes, which some people push into the rest, usually through government. By default no such schemes exist, so i am not the one that meddles in others business. If you want to get involved you are free to do so.


> No, i am not the one advocating for mandatory schemes, which some people push into the rest, usually through government.

I can conclude then that you are also not an advocate against child labour, as that is a mandatory scheme pushed through government. You are also not an advocate against monopolies, since those are regulated through the government.


Do you consider the above argument as lost and and want to try your luck in a new argument?


No, I just needed to reiterate it so perhaps you can get a glimpse of your own stupidity.


The good news is UK is democracy, so no need to worry.


/s presumably.

We're so democratic we lock up people who look like they might be going to protest against us having rulers selected by accident of birth, rulers we are forced to spend £10s of £Millions 'celebrating' despite them being some of the richest people in the World. You can't get more democratic than that! Good job everyone here has more than enough, so it's not at all immoral. /s


The FAA as government gets huge support from big corporations (bribes and other help, partnerships and funding), so of course has to do something for the favor. I doubt some random youtuber(s) can offer continued support to the government, so they are not at all in a similar power position. I am amazed that this is surprising to educated people.


Educated people can still have faith in the good, and be surprised at failings. I was intrigued that the famous Jewish theologian and civil rights activist Abraham Joshua Heschel included surprise as a kind of virtue: "I have one talent, and that is the capacity to be tremendously surprised, surprised at life, at ideas. This is to me the supreme Hasidic imperative: Don't be old. Don't be stale."


The FAA was to deep into bed with, e.g. Boeing, true. For everything else you claim, I'd like to see some evidence so.

I am surprised educated people can come up with unsubstentiated claims like that.


It's not surprising to everyone here.

It's just brought up as a topic of discussion. Everyone is pretty much aware of what you said.

What isn't fully spelled out is that there are social relationships involved as well. Responsible parties are buddy buddy with regulators while this YouTuber probably pissed off a regulator with his dumb antics so the regulator is unreasonably likely going all out in a fit of annoyance.


Sure sounds like it


What if they refund it immediately? Maybe that is what they did, to avoid detection. Anyone knows more about this?


If the checker is running the cards on their own merchant account and refunding immediately? Or doing auth, but not capture?

That's going to be in records of accounts that eventually report compromises, and get figured our pretty quick, I'd imagine.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: