Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | timar's commentslogin

How are you different from Notion?


Overall it should feel faster and simpler. We wanted to build a product that lets you focus on your work and not the tool.

You don't need to organize much like in Notion and it should feel less clunky.

The main differences in terms of features are aggregated tasks across the whole workspace, search across multiple tools (Google Drive, Linear), and side by side view.


On Windows there is extra spacing on top. On Linux/Samsung there is extra spacing on the bottom. Curious about Mac.

Very curious if someone on HN heard about this. I converted now the needed parts to svg to not have to battle this.


Paul is back but has 600 followers.


I wouldn't have assumed people would react that harshly but one comment on that tweet said they just turned them off.


This will happen even more when Android 13 is released. There is an extra permission for having notifications shown for every app separately. I know for sure I will disable notifications for pretty much every app except email and messengers.


You can already turn off notifications for an app in Android.

Making it a permission just makes it default -off rather than default -on


A 2 AM (CT US) notification is bound to have bothered a good amount of people that didn't have Do Not Disturb turned on.


There are alao plenty of us who just have notifications set to vibration mode without any sound full-time. The only phone alert in my case that makes sound is the alarm. Unless i put my phone on some hard surface or literally next to the bed, there is no way i will hear vibrating notifications, even when awake.

In general, I found vibration-only to be pretty much the default for a lot of people I know (though I am sharply aware that this is just anecdata and doesn't say much about the real state of things). I tried googling whether there was some breakdown of notification vibration vs sound smartphone users, but, sadly, couldn't find much.


neat, you can join instantly for discussions no fuss with registrations and with no video possible it there's no awkward cams on/cams off dynamic.


pretty sure it's not safe yet. unless you're in israel/new zealand.


I feel like, if PewDiePie can make 1 Million a month in youtube ad-revenue and 8 million total. A Newssite like NYT ought to be able to support their staff, thanks to a global reach and 240Million views per month.


8 million dollars over 1600 journalists is $5000 each. Pewdipie doesnt have the costs of running a news company and hes not in the news industry


Yeah, thats 8 million a month. i feel like 5k a month is pretty good pay for a journalist.


NYT should adopt the business model of a youtube edgelord and then pay its journalists submarket wages does not sound like a very realistic approach to running a solvent news organization.


Not very familiar with firefox or reader mode. But if it's something firefox does with the html of the website youre currently on. Than I see no reason why it couldn't work together. First getting the article with Readium, secondly starting Reader mode.


They do, but you have to apply and be selected. Compared to all users, its a fraction. And everyone else gets pushed into the paywall, because medium basically says: "If you don't we will not promote it and your post will die in obscurity"


so medium is running a business? Did you apply and get turned away?


No, I don't aspire to be a writer for a living. If I publish something I do it to share knowledge or for personal branding.


Ofc they're a business. But in youtube terms. As a creator you either put your video behind a paywall,and not necessarily get paid, or your video will never show up in any recommendations. So unless somebody searches for it or has the link. Nobody is going to see it. And every viewer on youtube gets 5 videos a month.

Has a bit of a bad taste for me.


Here is a gist of the commented code. It works by fetching the HTML content of the website, anonymously with no cookies. Using the fetch API. In a second step the HTML is preprocessed, removing javascript, inserting elements like images that might be done through javascript etc. The third step is to rerplace the current windows HTML with the clean-preprocessed HTML with the article.

https://gist.github.com/sugoidesune/884bfdf8a975920e98e7307e...


Nice...


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: