> He basically got the other side to admit that European healthcare, which has always been used as an argument as 'better' than US care, is actually not as good.

This is a lie. The article literally argues that European countries in question have better healthcare, less disease and therefore can afford less vacciness.

> There's this sick belief in parts of society that criminals (which becomes a permanent state of being) are valid targets for unlimited suffering.

Only poor criminals. They are all protective of rich white collar criminals, vote for criminal president etc.

Weightlifters use weight they can lift and feel good after the session. Literally. They may feel tired, but they feel good. They see weights go up and feel like progressing (unless they are in fact stagnating).

That is literal opposite of what OP describes. What OP describes is weight lifter taking on weight they cant lift and conatantly feeling like a failure after each training.

Frankly, they are not at all good at that. At least for me, they just failed. Thr fact is, they have no idea about when I am about to forget this or that fact.

Except that is bullshit. They did worked the other parts of the year too, just not doing the exact same agricultural work as those few weeks.

That thing simply ignores everything it takes to keep animals alive year round, keep kids alive year round, create and repair tools, keep house warm, create fabric, sew cloth, actually cook without modern tools and so on and so forth.

Just because there is a rush time does not mean workers do nothing the rest od the time.

Average person took long time off work to travel to visit far away friends? Call me sceptical, because this is provably untrue for pretty much any period and place we have actual resources about.

No, because it existed when economy was good too. It has nothing to do with economy state.

It is more of moral judgement thing, completely divorced from both needs and outcomes.

Yeah. And the same people seem puzzled when they see random citizens hating on AI with passion and treating it as a threat.

> And all the powers SCOTUS gave the executive branch will eventually be in the hands of the Loyal Opposition.

They will find excuses to reverse. There will be some technicality, made up historical precense or some actually untrue fact about the world that wil totally make the situation different.

Conservative heretage foundation group has outcome in mind ... and "opposition" is not their preffered outcome.

The downvoters assume that it is a bad faith question. The downvoters are 99% right with that. If the 1% hit then OP is just exceedingly naive and did not followed the scandal in which case they should maybe first do some reading.

The names of involved powerful people were NOT supposed to be censored. All those names except Bill Clinton name were redacted. To protect Trump and everybody else involved in the scandal except said Bill Clinton. But especially to protect Trump.

They also obscured the male perpetrators faces and bodies in many images, illegaly.

I assume that de facto federal "law" now makes it illegal to be raped, and those men are the victims. That would be a logical conclusion of edgelord vice signalling, right?

I know what all of these words mean, but not when they're in this order.

I took the question to mean "were the easily circumvented redactions only covering victim details, and maybe suspects from Team Not-One-of-Us?" Implying the "stupidity" card was played to cover the "malice" card.