> No doubt. But if your capable employees aren't providing value outside of "keeping the servers humming"
But you would usually consider serverless to need less people to manage it. So, even if they all work hard, someone will be not that useful one day or another.
Anyway I really don't see all this fuss about doing more with less (or doing more with the same) going serverless if you are already using infra as code and have a 100% automated CD/CI pipeline.
A greenfield project? Totally! But in an established org with good practices? Dunno.
But you would usually consider serverless to need less people to manage it. So, even if they all work hard, someone will be not that useful one day or another. Anyway I really don't see all this fuss about doing more with less (or doing more with the same) going serverless if you are already using infra as code and have a 100% automated CD/CI pipeline.
A greenfield project? Totally! But in an established org with good practices? Dunno.