Most of the article is about how climate change is expanding the territory of the disease,
trying to blame wildfire management is a massive stretch as the only proven way fires lead to it is when firefighters dig up soil to make fire lines, and the article cited 1 out of the 4,000 firefighters got it in the wild fire that that person digging through their house ruins got it.
The article clearly paints the picture of Climate change being the cause of the increase
Thanks! I skimmed the article and it seemed to make the somewhat bizarre claim that the disease is correlated with the fires. On a more careful reading they were setting up the fire argument and I missed the punch line. I can't stand the 'let's throw in a bunch of personal narratives and turn a 3 paragraphs story into a 7 pages mini-novel' journalistic style.
trying to blame wildfire management is a massive stretch as the only proven way fires lead to it is when firefighters dig up soil to make fire lines, and the article cited 1 out of the 4,000 firefighters got it in the wild fire that that person digging through their house ruins got it.
The article clearly paints the picture of Climate change being the cause of the increase