'So it's not just "better", it's "Better" with a capital 'B'. Nothing else out there comes even close. The Linux dcache is simply in a class all its own.' -Linus Torvalds
I do realize that the dcache is not a direct relation to the scheduler (but will certainly impact it), but I trust that performance enthusiasts will go to great lengths to extend Linux's top benchmarks in TPC and elsewhere.
It has also not been widely reported that a) Oracle posted a top TPC-C score shortly after acquiring Sun, running on 11g/Solaris SPARC 10, and b) OceanBase has now beaten that by an order of magnitude.
To see both the Oceanbase and Oracle 11g/Solaris scores, historical benchmarks must be enabled:
If your looking at the results I am, I see a system with with 28x the CPU's being 23x faster, after 10 years of cpu development. And substantially more expensive in total costs too?
Are we looking at the same thing? Did I get the math wrong? ( always a possibility ).
Yes, it's a much bigger topline number, but it doesn't seem very impressive given all the infrastructure differences?
'So it's not just "better", it's "Better" with a capital 'B'. Nothing else out there comes even close. The Linux dcache is simply in a class all its own.' -Linus Torvalds
https://www.tag1consulting.com/blog/interview-linus-torvalds...
I do realize that the dcache is not a direct relation to the scheduler (but will certainly impact it), but I trust that performance enthusiasts will go to great lengths to extend Linux's top benchmarks in TPC and elsewhere.
It has also not been widely reported that a) Oracle posted a top TPC-C score shortly after acquiring Sun, running on 11g/Solaris SPARC 10, and b) OceanBase has now beaten that by an order of magnitude.
To see both the Oceanbase and Oracle 11g/Solaris scores, historical benchmarks must be enabled:
https://www.tpc.org/tpcc/results/tpcc_results5.asp?print=fal...