Is there a colloquial interpretation of 'low carb' == 'no carbs' going on here?
Because quite a lot of us are on low(er) carb diets forever, having reduced our intake of pasta and potato to a 'sometimes food' but boosted our fruit and veg overall because of 'eat lots of colours'
We still eat carb. we eat -> less <- carbs than we used to. Is this not low carb? A lot of the heat in this discussion appears to be from keto people, who are 'no carb' not 'low(er) carb'
It's not a temporary diet shift: in my case, its 5+ years of a significantly different diet model. I still eat toast, from time to time, and I still enjoy carbs from time to time but they no longer represent 40-50% of the lunch and dinner plate.
Carbs include sugars == coke and pepsi, if you cut down on fizzy drinks, are you now 'low carb' in this discussion?
Over 60s are advised to increase protein in the diet anyway.
>having reduced our intake of pasta and potato to a 'sometimes food' but boosted our fruit and veg overall because of 'eat lots of colours'
What do you think fruit and vegetables primarily are, if not carbohydrate? Pasta is actually lower in carbohydrate (as a total % of macronutrient composition) than many fruits. For example, apples, which have virtually no protein or fat, unlike pasta.
And let me guess, "pasta" for you meant lots of cheese, oil, and maybe even some butter? In other words, lots of fat.
It's true that fruit is heaps of carbs. But, in aggregate we probably eat less than we used to. and the veg component of carbs compared to potato is lower, if not zero. Spuds are 20%+ carbs by weight. green beans or fennel or cauli more like 7%. Carrot is 10%. Parsnip probably closer to a potato.
We upped the veg part of fruit and veg more than we upped the fruit part. Pulses too. Which of course are also carbohydrate rich, but with more protein.
Pasta indeed meant a lot of cheese and oil. It still does, but far less frequently. The mediterranean diet actually is ok with olive oil and cheese, oils ain't oils (the whole 'its just energy in: energy out thing is gross oversimplification. convert pasta or spuds to cold pasta and spuds, you get resistant starch, it becomes more beneficial for lower gut health)
Mainly now I just eat small portions of food my grandmother would complain didn't come with ration stamps or have enough salt in, but recognize, which is what Michael Pollan says counts: Hit your grandmother with it, and if she doesn't die and says its a carrot, its ok to eat.
> What do you think fruit and vegetables primarily are, if not carbohydrate?
I wouldn’t discount how much easier it is to eat heaps of grain based foods, even without sauce or extra seasoning. Last I checked, a cup of cooked rice has about the same amount of carbs at 3-4 cups of frozen blueberries. I can eat 3 cups of plain cooked white rice like it’s nothing, but 3 cups of blueberries takes some work — I know because, during some experimentation with my diet, that was my meal: 1.5 lb 95% lean ground beef, 3 cups blueberries, 3 cups broccoli.
Because quite a lot of us are on low(er) carb diets forever, having reduced our intake of pasta and potato to a 'sometimes food' but boosted our fruit and veg overall because of 'eat lots of colours'
We still eat carb. we eat -> less <- carbs than we used to. Is this not low carb? A lot of the heat in this discussion appears to be from keto people, who are 'no carb' not 'low(er) carb'
It's not a temporary diet shift: in my case, its 5+ years of a significantly different diet model. I still eat toast, from time to time, and I still enjoy carbs from time to time but they no longer represent 40-50% of the lunch and dinner plate.
Carbs include sugars == coke and pepsi, if you cut down on fizzy drinks, are you now 'low carb' in this discussion?
Over 60s are advised to increase protein in the diet anyway.