Monty Python nicely addressed this, over 50 years ago.
> Mr. Hilton: Oh, we use only the finest juicy chunks of fresh Cornish ram's bladder, emptied, steamed, flavoured with sesame seeds, whipped into a fondue, and garnished with lark's vomit.
> Inspector: LARK'S VOMIT?!?!?
> Mr. Hilton: Correct.
> Inspector: It doesn't say anything here about lark's vomit!
> Mr. Hilton: Ah, it does, on the bottom of the box, after 'monosodium glutamate'.
> Inspector: I hardly think that's good enough! I think it's be more appropriate if the box bore a great red label: 'WARNING: LARK'S VOMIT!!!'
Really, it should open every conversation with “by the way, I am a compulsive liar, and nothing I say can be trusted”. That _might_ get through to _some_ users.
Humor aside I disagree. They are basically three types of people, the one who learns by reading, if you learn by observation, the rest just have to pee on the electric fence for themselves.
It kind of is - the ChatGPT site has this as a permanent fixture in the footer:
> ChatGPT may produce inaccurate information about people, places, or facts.
That's arguably ineffective though - even lawyers evidently don't read the small print in the footer!