Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

I am also skeptical of Landis, but what do you mean about preserving evidence?

It's a bullet. It just was next to an explosion that cleared it most most evidence. Then the barrel rifling altered the metal. That would not be harmed by picking it up. Then it went through jfk. Okay, we already know his DNA is on it.

The real question is why are you picking up random things from a crime scene and then putting them down in a hospital stretcher.



> The real question is why are you picking up random things

Probably seemed like a good idea at the time. My wife was in car accident once where the airbag deployed. For some reason her immediate reaction was to roll down the window. People in stressful and perilous situations sometimes do things that make no sense.


The gasses generated by an airbag are quite toxic and don't smell very good.

Why wouldn't she open a window?


I’ve been in a wreck and burned by the hot explosive gases filling those harsh burlap sacks known as air bags; I am opening a window or door ASAP too.

It’s funny how advertising depicts air bags as these soft pillows when they are anything but inviting during the moment of deployment.


> I am also skeptical of Landis, but what do you mean about preserving evidence?

I don't really know, but it hardly seems like good practise to pick up a bullet. Don't crime scene investigators usually take calibrated pictures of important items such as bullets and often try to determine the trajectory?

There's also the chain of custody to think about - the bullet could easily have been swapped with a different bullet after he left it on the stretcher.


"I don't really know, but it hardly seems like good practise to pick up a bullet"

Of course it's not but that was no ordinary crime scene. There were thousands of people about, what would happen to the vehicle etc., etc? There's no way the crime scene could be secured in such a short time. And JFK had to be rushed to hospital. Nothing was certain.

He saw the bullet as evidence and on the spur of the moment secured it. After that he was likely in shock and thus his actions were more that of an automaton.


Picking up the bullet destroys the evidence of the exact location it ended up in.


Would he be expected to know we would spend decades doing ballistic studies on that bullet trajectory in the heat of the moment?


So would the car accellerating after the bullet landed there. Picking it up and putting it on the stretcher seems plausible?


Are you from some other timeline where there was explosion at Kennedy assassination?

The bullet they are talking about is the "magic bullet" that hit Kennedy and Connally. The bullet that hit Kennedy's head distinegrated and they found fragments.


> Are you from some other timeline where there was explosion at Kennedy assassination?

> The bullet they are talking about is the "magic bullet" that hit Kennedy and Connally. The bullet that hit Kennedy's head distinegrated and they found fragments.

The explosion they are referring to is the one inside the firearm when the firing pin strikes the cartridge.

No need to be unkind.


Bullets, in general, are next to an "explosion" when fired from any gun that propels bullets via explosion.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: