Fortunately, AI interests are massive and well funded. I am confident suggestions will be the best that money can buy.
This isn't a complaint but a perspective to add some context (and to remind that the public is the least-funded stakeholder in a gov RFC).
I don't weigh heavily for or against AI/DL/LLM/ML computing. I do hope our gov representatives 1) have sufficient wisdom/knowledge and 2) are well-enough insulated from corruption to write regs that benefit the public, long-term.
No, the interests that are well funded are of closed-source AI to maintain an unfair and artificial moat against open-source AI. In contrast, the interests of open-source AI are not that well funded.
> are well-enough insulated from corruption
They really are not, and the Supreme Court isn't either. In fact, lying and scheming practically are prerequisites to being a politician.
