Comparing Nim to compiled Python is almost insulting.

Smaller binaries, faster execution, proper metaprogramming, actual type safety, and you don't need to bundle a whole interpreter just to say "hello world"

I agree, it was just a succinct way of putting it. It's syntactically similar, which makes it easier for Python devs to shift to using it for higher-performance stuff. Aside from that, it's its own thing with its own unique offering.

My real point was that if you want "typed Python", you're doing it wrong. It wasn't built with that in mind, and probably will never be. You should just a tool that actually has strong typing in mind from the start. Nim fits that bill.