Hacker News
new
|
past
|
comments
|
ask
|
show
|
jobs
|
submit
login
kabes
8 months ago
|
parent
|
context
|
favorite
| on:
Jepsen: Amazon RDS for PostgreSQL 17.4
Then you haven't read enough jepsen reports. Distributed system guarantees generally can't be trusted
__alexs
8 months ago
[–]
Postgres is not a distributed system in this configuration usually though is it?
semiquaver
8 months ago
|
parent
|
next
[–]
The result is for “Amazon RDS for PostgreSQL multi-AZ clusters” which are certainly a distributed system.
I’m not well versed in RDS but I believe that clustered is the only way to use it.
dragonwriter
8 months ago
|
root
|
parent
|
next
[–]
An RDS cluster can have a single instance (but it can't be multi-AZ with a single instance.)
NewJazz
8 months ago
|
root
|
parent
|
prev
|
next
[–]
No, you can have single instances
reissbaker
8 months ago
|
root
|
parent
|
next
[–]
This writeup tested multi-AZ RDS for Postgres — which is always distributed behind the scenes (otherwise, it couldn't exist in multiple AZs).
dragonwriter
8 months ago
|
parent
|
prev
[–]
A multi-AZ cluster is necessarily a distributed system.
Guidelines
|
FAQ
|
Lists
|
API
|
Security
|
Legal
|
Apply to YC
|
Contact
Search: