Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

> The "reasonable" standard asks whether a hypothetical, ordinary and rational person, acting reasonably, would reach the same conclusion based on the same information. And this can be decided by a judge or jury if/when necessary.

It's subjective in other words. A jury would be unnecessary otherwise.



Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: