Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

git-absorb (https://github.com/tummychow/git-absorb) does a bit more, figuring out the exact changes that should be fixed up.


git-autofixup is better and easier to install: https://github.com/torbiak/git-autofixup


Could you elaborate how it is better?


They are quite different methods, explained by the respective implementations. IME autofixup finds the relevant commit successfully more often. There's no reason you can't use both, of course. I would always check the results of either before actually doing the rebase.


JJ absorb does the same as far as I understand




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: