Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

But those are still approximations to the actual underlying reality. Because the other option (and yes, it's a dichotomy) is that we already defined and understood every detail of the physics that applies to our universe.


Indeed, that is a dichotomy: a false one. Science is exact without being finished.


So, was Newtonian physics exact already?


> Science is exact without being finished


Being exact doesn't mean it is not an approximation, which was the initial topic. Being exact in science means that 2+2=4 and that can be demonstrated following a logical chain. But that doesn't make our knowledge of the universe exact. It is still an approximation. What it can be "exact" is how we obtain and reproduce the current knowledge we have of it.


The speed of light, or plank's constant - are these approximations?


To our current knowledge, no. But maybe we are missing something, we cannot know. Did infrared light or ultrasound start to exist only when we realized there are things our senses cannot feel?




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: