Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

OK sounds great.

But some companies prefer to have trackers. They are required by GDPR to explain each cookie and offer a control for permissions. They probably had trackers before GDPR too. So how is that malicious compliance? They are just operating how they did before except now they are observing GDPR.

It sounds like maybe you just want them to ban trackers. Or for people to care more about trackers and stop using websites with trackers (thereby driving down trackers) Great. Those are all great. But none of them happened and none of that is dictated by GDPR.



Malicious compliance are those dark patterns where it takes on click to accept all but multiple clicks to reject all.

I remember the early day cookie banners of Tumbler accept all or deselect 200 tracking cookies by clicking each checkbox.


You can have first party trackers. That is not so hard. Every site onto itself is a first party tracker, but if your developers can't do it there are opensource solutions available to host.


1p solutions still require consent since the analytics banners are also there to enable processing of personal information in the first place (on the most primitive level IP address)


Oh? But the site is processing IP address when the web server logs your visit. Maybe I missed a part of GDPR somewhere, guess I gotta re-read it.


Again, great. Didn't happen and isn't required by GDPR though.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: