Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Google+, the Play Store and many other services are not open. In some cases, they may have APIs, but they are not open APIs. They have closed down more open platforms, such as Reader, in favor of the more closed platforms, like Google+.

That doesn't mean they are a closed company today, but I believe they've turned the corner. Just like Facebook has a lot of OSS projects but isn't an "open company", I think Google has shifted the balance away from openness, even though they have a lot of OSS projects. I see them as qualitatively the same, but significantly different in degree. I wouldn't have said that three years ago.

EDIT: I realized I answered how Google is closing, but not how they are closing the web.

I think that has to do with two things: preferential treatment of their services in search results and hiding information behind Google logins. The former makes it harder to find anything Google hasn't sanctioned; the latter makes it harder to go elsewhere to get your search results.

I see it as exactly the same thing as Facebook pages for businesses instead of web sites. Sure, http is fine and intact, but now we are beholden to Facebook for information.



What evidence do you have that they give preferential treatment of their own services in search results? (Hopefully you can provide something more concrete than a suspicion or anecdotal evidence).

Everything I've read suggests google throws themselves in with everyone else in search results. They even penised one of their own sites once to keep it fair.


They did what?


Oops, "penalised". Wrote that on my phone!

More info: http://www.belmont.uk.com/blog/view/141-google-penalises-its...




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: