The term "neighbor" here is confusing. Venus has the planetary orbits right next to Earth's. That makes them "neighbors" - they live right next door from each other.
Mercury is the closest planet on average, but calling it the closest neighbor is just confusing.
This is exactly my thinking. In this context, I think the paper depends on an implied ambiguity of the word 'neighbor' and how it's used in the context of orbiting bodies.
When I think of 'neighbors' in the context of the solar system, I am generally thinking of neighboring orbits. It would be hard to argue that Venus's orbit is not the closest orbit to Earth's. Or at least it would seem silly to do so.
Maybe I'm being overly pedantic here, but my view is that orbits have neighbors, and planets have orbits, but planets don't necessarily have neighbors. Something in the word 'neighbor' implies persistence to me, so I don't really consider average-closest planet to be a neighbor when exactly which planet is closest to any other changes constantly.
Agreed, that was my initial thought and I was going to comment the exact same thing as you and then I decided to check up the meaning if neighbour. Turned out I've misunderstood the meaning my whole life and it doesn't just mean next to, it means nearby.
Mercury is the closest planet on average, but calling it the closest neighbor is just confusing.